Container vessel alongside a port terminal under gantry cranes
Product / 01Flagship · Pilot-ready

Maritime Security

What a watch floor lacks is not data. It is judgment, exercised in time.

One operating picture, assembled from vessel activity, sensor observation, behaviour and analyst evidence. Of everything a coastline produces in a day, it puts forward only what warrants a decision, and it shows the reasoning that qualified it.

Built for

Maritime authorities, ports, offshore operators, and systems integrators

Pilot scorecard

Detection to triage time · warning horizon · precision at K

Maritime Security
Live
East coast AOI62 tracks correlated
TRK-0417 · selected17.68 N · 83.27 E · 11.2 kn · 3 sources
Contacts for review03 open
  • TRK-0417Reporting gap, track persistsHigh
  • TRK-0392Course change in a protected laneReview
  • TRK-0355Identity requires verificationMedium
Evidence · TRK-0417Reporting gap on one hull
EO 04:41
Declared
Fishing vessel
Observed
18.4 kn sustained
AIS
Off 02:10–04:40
Explanations
3 retained
Evidence discipline
Competing explanations retained
Human decision recorded
InvestigateDismiss with reason
AIS · currentCoastal radar · currentEO feed · currentRegistry · synced 04:00
Watch 2 · 04:52 IST
What the product does

Six capabilities. Each one answerable to the watch that uses it.

Every capability below exists to change what an operator does with the next contact, not merely what they know about it. They are described as they work, with the reasoning each one leaves behind.

01Multi-source fusion

One hull, one track, whatever the sensor.

Radar returns, cooperative reporting and electro-optical imagery each describe a vessel in their own vocabulary, and today the reconciliation is done by hand. The product correlates them into a single, continuously maintained track, so the watch reads one account of the coastline rather than three that disagree.

  • Cooperative and non-cooperative sources correlated into one picture
  • Track continuity held through reporting gaps and sensor handoffs
  • Every contribution to a track kept, attributed and open to inspection
Track fusion · TRK-0417
3 sources · 1 track
AIS GAP · 02:10–04:40TRK-0417CONTINUITY HELD THROUGH GAP · 3 SOURCES ATTRIBUTED
AIS reportRadar plotEO detectionFused track
Track age 06:32 · last fix radar
02Behaviour and identity analytics

Identity is what a vessel does, not what it declares.

Self-reported identity is an assertion. Behaviour is evidence. The product reads speed, course, loitering, rendezvous and the pattern of a hull over time, and holds each against what a vessel of its declared type, route and destination would ordinarily do.

  • Behavioural baselines by vessel class, route and season
  • Anomalies scored against expectation, not a fixed threshold
  • Declared identity tested against observed conduct
Vessel assessment · TRK-0392
Deviation · review
Declared
Type
Fishing vessel
Flag
Coastal state
Destination
Chennai · ETA 06:00
Draught
3.1 m
Observed
Sustained speed
18.4 kn
Loiter
02:10–04:40, 3 nm off lane
Rendezvous
1 contact, 22 min
Night AIS
Switched off twice
Speed over ground · last 8 hClass baseline 5–8 kn
EXPECTED FOR CLASSNOW

Assessment. Conduct is inconsistent with the declared class on four counts. Identity requires verification before the approach is cleared.

03Mission areas and watchlists

Attention is finite. Direct it where the mandate is.

An authority's obligations are specific: a lane to protect, an installation to guard, a list of hulls to follow. The product turns those obligations into standing areas of interest and watchlists, so the picture is organised around what the institution is answerable for.

  • Geofenced mission areas with entry, exit and dwell rules
  • Watchlists with provenance, review dates and ownership
  • Priorities set by mandate and adjustable by the watch
Mission areas · East coast
4 areas · 2 active
PROTECTED LANEPLATFORM · 2 NM STANDOFFANCHORAGE ADWELL 41 MIN
WatchlistOwner · Ops 2
  • TRK-0392
    Identity unverifiedReview 12 Sep
  • IMO ····418
    Prior sanction interestReview 30 Sep
  • TRK-0355
    Dark near platform, AugReview 04 Oct
  • Hull ····72
    Partner agency requestReview 18 Oct
Area rules
EntryAlert
Dwell> 30 min
ExitLog
04Competing explanations

A conclusion is only as good as the alternatives it survived.

When a track goes dark near a protected lane there is more than one explanation. The product keeps them side by side, with the evidence for and against each, and records which one the analyst accepted and why. The reasoning becomes part of the record rather than a memory.

  • Hypotheses ranked, with the evidence attributed to each
  • Analyst judgment recorded alongside the alternatives considered
  • Confidence expressed and contradiction preserved, not averaged away
Explanations · TRK-0392
3 hypotheses retained
  • H1Transshipment at sea0.58
    For
    Rendezvous 22 minAIS off during contactCourse reversal
    Against
    Sea state 4
  • H2Shelter from weather0.27
    For
    Sea state 4Nearby hulls also slowed
    Against
    Only hull to go darkRendezvous
  • H3Equipment fault0.15
    For
    Intermittent AIS in July
    Against
    Both outages during contactFault not reported
Analyst decision

Investigate. H1 accepted; H2 and H3 retained on the record.

Recorded 04:52 · Watch 2 · Kumar
05Historical replay and reporting

What happened is a question the system should answer.

After an incident, the enquiry begins. The product replays the picture as the watch saw it, minute by minute, with the alerts raised, the actions taken and the evidence available at the time. The report is produced from the record, not from recollection.

  • Full-picture replay at any past moment
  • Timeline of alerts, reviews, handovers and overrides
  • Reports assembled from the audit trail, ready for review
Replay · 11 Sep · 01:40–06:10
Playback 04:52
02:10
03:25
04:40
04:52
Alerts raised2both reviewed
Overrides0none recorded
Time to decision28 minfrom first alert
Incident reportAssembled from record · ready
06Interoperable track and event APIs

It joins the estate the authority already owns.

Sensors, command systems and vessel traffic services are already installed and already paid for. The product publishes tracks and events over open interfaces and consumes the feeds already in place, so it strengthens the existing architecture rather than asking anyone to replace it.

  • Standards-based track and event exchange
  • Deployment from the coastal edge to the control room
  • Roles, audit and retention aligned to institutional policy
Interfaces · Track and event exchange
Open standards
Consumes
  • AIS receiversNMEA · terrestrial and satellite
  • Coastal radarASTERIX plots and tracks
  • EO / IR feedsRTSP and still capture
  • RegistriesVessel, licence and watchlist data
Publishes to
Command & controlVTSPartner agenciesReportingData platform
Event · track.qualified200 · published
{
  "track_id": "TRK-0417",
  "sources": ["ais", "radar", "eo"],
  "position": { "lat": 17.68, "lon": 83.27 },
  "area": "EAST_COAST_AOI",
  "assessment": {
    "level": "review",
    "reasons": ["ais_gap", "lane_deviation"],
    "hypotheses": 3,
    "confidence": 0.58
  },
  "decision": {
    "by": "watch-2",
    "action": "investigate",
    "at": "2026-09-11T04:52:00+05:30"
  }
}
From sensor to decision

A detection is not yet an alert. An alert is not yet a decision.

The distance between them is where most of the work, and most of the failure, sits. The product moves every contact through four stages, and leaves a record at each.

  1. 01

    Observe

    Radar, cooperative reporting, electro-optical feeds and registries arrive as they are, in their own formats and on their own clocks.

  2. 02

    Correlate

    Observations that describe the same hull are joined into one track, with each source's contribution attributed and retained.

  3. 03

    Qualify

    Behaviour is measured against expectation and mandate. Only what warrants a decision is raised, and it arrives with its reasoning.

  4. 04

    Decide

    The watch reviews, investigates or dismisses. The judgment, the alternatives and the outcome are recorded for the next watch and the enquiry after.

The operating problem

The signal that mattered is usually found afterwards, scattered across tracks, sensors, registries and manual work that were never meant to be read together.

What the product produces

A prioritised picture that carries its reasoning with it, so a watch can move from detection to investigation, and hand over to the next watch, without the evidence thinning at each step.

Why the demand exists

Operational intelligence with a clear purpose.

A coastline produces far more observation than any watch can absorb, and the cost of a connection not drawn is counted in incidents, not in tickets. The obligation is to make the few things that matter visible among the many that do not.

Sources do not agree
Radar, cooperative reporting and imagery describe the same hull differently, and reconciling them is still largely done by hand.
Volume beats attention
No operator can sustain review across every track, so prioritisation has to be defensible rather than arbitrary.
Evidence has to survive handover
When the watch changes, the context is lost unless the reasoning travels with the track.
Integration, not replacement
Authorities already own their sensors and systems. The product has to sit alongside them.
Product readiness

A working foundation. A clear path to deployment.

Explore the capabilities available to demonstrate today and the next milestones for a focused pilot. Together, we define the integrations, validation and deployment requirements for your operating environment.

Ready to demonstrate
  • Working track fusion and prioritisation over representative scenarios
  • Operator console with evidence, timeline, and analyst review states
  • Event and track APIs for downstream integration
Next steps for a pilot
  • Planned pilot milestone: connect to the authority’s operational sensor feeds
  • Planned pilot preparation: security assessment, certification and accreditation aligned with the authority’s requirements