A dense grid of surveillance cameras mounted on a wall
Product / 03In development · Pilot scoping

Computer Vision

A plant does not lack coverage. It lacks attention, sustained through the small hours.

A configurable product that turns an installed camera estate into sustained attention. It watches what no team can watch continuously, and it puts a person in the loop before anything is called an incident.

Built for

Factories, warehouses, utilities, infrastructure operators, and safety teams

Pilot scorecard

Alert precision · response time · unsafe-exposure reduction

The operating problem

Cameras record incidents after they occur, and manual monitoring loses weak signals across more feeds than any team can hold in view at once.

What the product produces

A small number of alerts, routed to the people who can act, each carrying its context and leaving a review trail that survives the shift it was raised in.

Capabilities

What it does, stated plainly.

Protective equipment and restricted-zone monitoring
Unsafe-action and machine-proximity cues
Smoke, fire, and obstruction detection
Crowding and queue awareness for operations as well as safety
Camera health monitoring so a blind feed is never mistaken for a quiet one
Human review and incident audit as part of the workflow
Works with installed camera estates rather than requiring replacement
On-site inference, so footage does not have to leave the perimeter
Why the demand exists

The demand is structural, not seasonal.

Most sites already carry the capital cost of a camera estate and recover almost none of its operational value, because no one is watching most of the feeds most of the time. The gap is not equipment. It is sustained attention, which no organisation can staff indefinitely.

Coverage exceeds attention
A site with hundreds of cameras has a control room that can meaningfully watch a handful.
Review is retrospective
Footage is pulled after an incident, which is useful for investigation and useless for prevention.
Privacy is a constraint, not a footnote
Continuous video analysis raises legitimate questions that have to be answered in the product design.
Replacement is not viable
The commercial case collapses if it requires new cameras, so the product has to work with what is installed.
Where this actually stands

What is built, and what is not.

An evaluator's first job is to find the gap between the claim and the code. Stating it first is faster for everyone, and it is the part of a pilot conversation that determines whether the rest is worth having.

Built and demonstrable
  • Configurable detection over representative camera scenarios
  • Safety console with verification states and incident audit
  • Camera health and coverage monitoring
Not built yet
  • No deployment on a customer's production camera estate
  • Per-site accuracy requires tuning against that site's own footage